Escort Radar Forum  

Go Back   Escort Radar Forum > News > Escort Radar Announcements

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 29th, 2010
CJR238's Avatar
CJR238 CJR238 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 1,652
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine_c1 View Post
X-Band sensitivity on the 9500ix is not up to snuff with the 9500ci. X-Band is overswept by both detectors to pick up LO emissions from cobras to block falses that show up as Ka alerts (3rd harmonic of the Cobra's spewing LO).
so your saying because the CI is more sensitive to X band its able to filter cobras KA falses better?
__________________
To embrace technology is not to blindly accept it. We must always question technology but never be afraid to use it.
RedLine
9500ci
9500ix
9500I x2
8500


My 9500I/ix review and TrueLock info:
http://escortradarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96

My install: http://escortradarforum.com/forums/s...1131#post11131

9500CI tests:
http://escortradarforum.com/forums/s...ead.php?t=1312
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old January 29th, 2010
Nine_c1's Avatar
Nine_c1 Nine_c1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJR238 View Post
so your saying because the CI is more sensitive to X band its able to filter cobras KA falses better?
Yes sir. The Cobra's LO operates right around 11.2 GHZ. The 3rd harmonic of 11.2 is 33.6 which is obviously well within the Ka Band.

All Belscort detectors oversweep both the X-Band (10.525) and K-Band (24.150) to pickup up the 1st or 2nd harmonic of the leaking LO emission from the Cobra, and if found, block out the 3rd harmonic which shows up in the Ka Band.

Picking up the 1st harmonic is the easiest since it's the fundamental frequency. Thats why I believe Belscorts do so much better than the Valentine at screening out Cobra's. Escort patented the X-Band oversweep which force's Valentine to continue using K-Band oversweeps alone to find the 2nd harmonic of the leaky LO. Using K-Band oversweeps is not optimal for LO detection as some Radar Detectors use K-Band image filters to suppress leakage of the 2nd LO harmonic..........ie. COBRA!

Screening out Cobra falses should be an easy thing provided the X and Ka band sensitivity of the detector are approximate. The fundamental, or 1st multiple of the leaky LO, will always be the easiest to detect. However, the M4 platform in the 9500ix is not particulary strong on X-Band, having the single horn and primary mixer tuned more for Ka/K sensitivity. The 9500ci dedicates a seperate LNA/Horn/LO/Mixer soley to X-Band reception and so has better balance and the sensitivity on X-Band is more proportional to Ka and K.
__________________

Last edited by Nine_c1; January 30th, 2010 at 08:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old January 29th, 2010
EscortRadar's Avatar
EscortRadar EscortRadar is offline
Official Escort Rep
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by solara View Post
I'm still chuckling over Toter Winkel
That got me too LOL
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old January 29th, 2010
Rocky2's Avatar
Rocky2 Rocky2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine_c1 View Post
Yes sir. The Cobra's LO operates right around 11.2 GHZ. The 3rd harmonic of 11.2 is 33.6 which is obviously well within the Ka Band.

All Belscort detectors oversweep both the X-Band (10.525) and K-Band (24.150) to pickup up the 1st or 2nd harmonic of the leaking LO emission from the Cobra, and if found, block out the 3rd harmonic which shows up in the Ka Band.

Picking up the 1st harmonic is the easiest since it's the fundamental frequency. Thats why I believe Belscorts do so much better than the Valentine at screening out Cobra's........Escort patented the X-Band oversweep which forced Valentine to use K-Band oversweeps alone to find the 2nd harmonic of the leaky LO. Using K-Band oversweeps is not optimal for LO detection as some Radar Detectors use K-Band image filters to suppress leakage of the 2nd LO harmonic..........ie. COBRA!

Screening out Cobra falses should be an easy thing provided the X and Ka band sensivity of the detector are approximate. The fundamental, or 1st multiple of the leaky LO, will always be the easiest to detect. However, the M4 platform in the 9500ix is not particulary strong on X-Band, having the single horn and primary mixer tuned more for Ka/K sensitivity. The 9500ci dedicates a seperate LNA/Horn/LO/Mixer soley to X-Band reception and so has better balance and the sensitivity on X-Band is more proportional to Ka and K.
That was some good info, if you turn X band off do you open yourself up more Cobra Ka falses.
__________________
Countermeasures:

Radar Detectors: Redline, 9500i, 9500ix, 8500 X50 (S7), Rx-65 (M4), and V1 (3.819)
Jammers: Blinder M47 + Veil G4
CB: Uniden 520 + Lil Will Antenna
Scanner: Radio Shack Pro-107
GPS: TomTom with Trapster
Cheetah C50
Car: 2004 Mustang

My Detector Videos
http://www.youtube.com/user/rockyb8663
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old January 29th, 2010
EscortRadar's Avatar
EscortRadar EscortRadar is offline
Official Escort Rep
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine_c1 View Post
... since it uses doppler radar, is it going to be another constant source for false alerts on our Escort radar detectors?
Only if everyone around you has a Guardian Alert and is driving in reverse. The signal is only present when backing, it isn't always on.

The Guardian Alert operates within X band but is modulated, our detectors will see the signal but should not alert to it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old January 29th, 2010
CJR238's Avatar
CJR238 CJR238 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 1,652
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EscortRadar View Post
Only if everyone around you has a Guardian Alert and is driving in reverse. The signal is only present when backing, it isn't always on.

The Guardian Alert operates within X band but is modulated, our detectors will see the signal but should not alert to it.
I'm assuming for the same reasons Nine_c1 mentioned in his explanation of Cobra filtering.
__________________
To embrace technology is not to blindly accept it. We must always question technology but never be afraid to use it.
RedLine
9500ci
9500ix
9500I x2
8500


My 9500I/ix review and TrueLock info:
http://escortradarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96

My install: http://escortradarforum.com/forums/s...1131#post11131

9500CI tests:
http://escortradarforum.com/forums/s...ead.php?t=1312
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old January 29th, 2010
Nine_c1's Avatar
Nine_c1 Nine_c1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky2 View Post
That was some good info, if you turn X band off do you open yourself up more Cobra Ka falses.
I have to say no. Turning X-Band and K-Band off had virtually no effect in response times when I tested the RedLine for how quick it responds to Ka signals (QT testing). This leads me to believe that the detector is still sweeping those frequencies for the purpose of finding and blocking LO emissions from other detectors.

Also, most of us have X-Band turned off and we are still realizing fantastic Ka false suppression to the Cobras.

Since the bandwidth on X-Band is only 100MHZ and K-Band is a single 200MHZ channel, there is not alot of time to be saved by eliminating the actual sweep on these two frequencies anyway. Therefore, I believe the detector just does not report any signals detected in these bands when they are turned off.

Turning off Ka band certainly does eliminate the actual sweep time required to scan the 2.6 GHZ channel. If you turn Ka band off (at least on the M3) you have yourself a lighting quick detector for X and K Band. I was able to consistently pick up .13 second K-Band bursts with the RedLine when I had Ka Band turned off.
__________________

Last edited by Nine_c1; January 29th, 2010 at 10:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old January 29th, 2010
Nine_c1's Avatar
Nine_c1 Nine_c1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EscortRadar View Post
Only if everyone around you has a Guardian Alert and is driving in reverse. The signal is only present when backing, it isn't always on.

The Guardian Alert operates within X band but is modulated, our detectors will see the signal but should not alert to it.
That's exactly the situation I face every day at Walmart! Except not everyone has a Guardian yet.........but the morons in that parking lot sure do need one.

Modulated X-Band.........my worries are laid to rest! Thanks ER for the reply!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old January 29th, 2010
EscortRadar's Avatar
EscortRadar EscortRadar is offline
Official Escort Rep
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,058
Default

I found out it is technically called swept X band, not modulated. Our M3s do not see it so no worries.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old January 31st, 2010
Nine_c1's Avatar
Nine_c1 Nine_c1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 960
Default

Quote:

EscortRadar
Official Escort Rep
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,132



Quote:
Originally Posted by solara
I'm still chuckling over Toter Winkel

That got me too LOL
You guys have to brush up on your Deutsch! Toter Winkel means Dead Angle.......ie. blind spot......in German.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 Escort Inc.