![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Why is there always time to do it over, but never time to do it right? Check your spelling and grammar- The English Teacher |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
By Bill Sizemore
The Virginian-Pilot © February 11, 2010 RICHMOND Virginia will remain the only state in the nation where radar detectors are illegal. A bill to repeal the state’s 48-year-old ban on the devices was defeated Thursday by the House of Delegates, 61-38. The sponsor of HB674, Del. Joe May, R-Leesburg, argued that the ban is inhospitable to visitors and that radar detectors enhance traffic safety by encouraging motorists to slow down. But the majority of delegates were swayed by opponents’ arguments that the devices contribute to excessive speed. The state police opposed the measure. “Speed on the roads of the commonwealth is a major problem,” said Del. Manoli Loupassi, R-Richmond. “I don’t think we ought to be passing laws that make our roads less safe
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Why is there always time to do it over, but never time to do it right? Check your spelling and grammar- The English Teacher |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Was defeated today 38-61. C/O in VA still!!!
__________________
To embrace technology is not to blindly accept it. We must always question technology but never be afraid to use it. RedLine 9500ci 9500ix 9500I x2 8500 My 9500I/ix review and TrueLock info: http://escortradarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96 My install: http://escortradarforum.com/forums/s...1131#post11131 9500CI tests: http://escortradarforum.com/forums/s...ead.php?t=1312 |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well......on the bright side (for Escort).......there will still be quite a few commuters needing a stealth detector in the US!
![]() ![]()
__________________
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another example of "GOVERNMENT OUT OF CONTROL". Several Polls have consistently shown that the great majority of Virginia citizens believe that this "ban" is ridiculous, and most think it's "unconstitutional." Public airways are not the property of GOVERNMENT; they are "public domain." Governments can legitimately restrict transmission on certain frequencies in order to fulfill government functions, but Governments cannot restrict "receiving" on any frequency.
Why do you think you need a "proprietary descrambler" to get Satellite TV? It's because, long ago, the Supreme Court ruled that you can not stop a citizen from "receiving" satellite frequencies or any other frequencies. If something on those frequencies is "proprietary" is the responsibility of the "transmitting entity" to take measures to protect that propriety. Do you think a Radio Station has "standing" in our Legal System if they decide you must pay them to listen to their Station and you refuse to do so? What's next; is the State or Federal Government going to make it illegal to listen to "law enforcement frequencies"? Are they going to make the manufacture of "radar detectors" illegal just as they are trying to do with GUNS? If a State or Federal Government wants its "laser, radar, radio or any other emissions" to be undetectable, it's there responsibility to figure out how. Every society that has transitioned from FREEDOM to Totalitarian Rule lost their freedoms gradually, one little step at a time, until one day they realized they were no longer FREE. But, by then, of course, THEY WERE SCREWED! RULED, but NOT SERVED..............that's where we're headed, and we're almost there.
__________________
"Hollow Points"-"From Those Who Care Enough To Send The Very Best" Last edited by bigwes; February 12th, 2010 at 09:05 PM. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Why is there always time to do it over, but never time to do it right? Check your spelling and grammar- The English Teacher |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
[/quote] I find it rather telling that this proven relatively simple and cheap technology has gone untapped by governments while revenue generating cameras have spread like wildfire even in the face of reports which question their effectiveness at increasing safety
[/quote]You are correct about questionable safety. Virginia Beach has gone hog wild with red light cams, and rear end collisions have dramatically increases because of them. It's not about safety at all, it's all about the Benjamin's. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|